Kyle

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 1,238 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: #2548
    Kyle
    Member

    That’s cool, I have no desire to run this thing. I’ll pass on anyone who I think would be useful to you.

    in reply to: #28283
    Kyle
    Member

    Heh. You forgot to put at the top of that ‘Year 2020?’ as a title.

    There were 13 peewees at practise on Tuesday, including my son (very exciting!). They’ll get some more registrations and some kiwihockey kids, so I suspect they’ll make it up to two teams. So they’ll be playing a semi-regular game Saturday 5:30.

    Midgets I can’t imagine are any better, but they might be able to pull in some high school kids who aren’t playing for the Association. They’re playing a game Saturday 6:30.

    Neither of those you could really call ‘grades’, so much as an intrasquad game. Like I said in my email, I can’t see any advantage in adding to the overhead, there’s no need for them to be a league at this stage.

    Women are struggling to make 1 team. And if they took every woman playing hockey and put them out there for a game, they might squeeze up to two teams, but the difference between some of the beginners they’d have to throw on, and Zanzee and Megan etc. I’d be keen to see the women entering as a B grade team, and maybe an allowance for Zanzee to play down or something to help them out.

    I presume by SNC you mean DIHL? C grade isn’t confirmed, but if we get 8 B teams we’ll go for it. Contact… worth exploring, but there’s issues we both know about.

    It does remind me though to ask you. What do we need to give people to allow them access to the administrators forum? It used to be a password, but is it a button you push in their profile now?

    Kyle

    in reply to: #2486
    Kyle
    Member
    "Ryan":bedcpcic wrote:
    "Kyle":bedcpcic wrote:
    If it’s a shooting gallery, then no net is going to be an adequate replacement for a wall. Nets degrade, do so less obviously (ie, small holes that people might hit occasionally), and if there’s a few hundred slap shots going into it every day, then no net is going to last that long.[/quote:bedcpcic]

    Well if the existing wall was left there, then there’s no problem with hitting people. All that would be needed I think would be a shield for the cooling tower. In theory the pucks may be able to go over the top of the cooling tower so that is possibly a problem I guess. Indoor cricket centers use netting to keep the balls in and they don’t seem to have any issues with that method and I’m assuming that hockey pucks would be about the same. The main problem with the nets I suspect will be people crashing into them as that would put quite a lot more force onto them than the puck would.[/quote:bedcpcic]

    Yeah, but the use that indoor cricket netting gets, where a ball is hit against it a few times each game, compared to netting behind a hockey goal where someone is practising slapshots… And I don’t know how fast cricket balls get hit, but I’d presume hockey pucks are a fair bit faster, and they’re shaped more to damage netting.

    Anyway, I guess your netting would only need to be as strong as the netting in a hockey goal. Those goal nets seem to stand up to plenty of shots.

    The netting that the inline hockey club however put in their goals – I think it might have been fishing net stuff – that tore and got wrecked easily.

    "Ryan":bedcpcic wrote:
    The other flip side of the coin … why use fundraising money when we can do it for free? I’d rather see something built immediately and upgraded later (presumably with fundraised money), atleast we can use it in the mean time.[/quote:bedcpcic]

    Well I guess if the eventual wall was to replace netting, you’d have gone to the effor t of buying and putting up nets, when they weren’t needed in the eventual finished unit.

    I’m arguing for a bunch of things here, from the general rule of ‘better to see if it’s worth doing properly the first time rather than a hacked together job and then have to redo it properly later’. The whole ice rink was done that way – olympic size, professional boards and glass etc. Why shouldn’t the off-ice area go the same way? Should there be weights/gym area? What are the other needs of that area? Do they still store the Xmas show stuff up there?

    There’s no clamouring for the players for it. Phil raised this almost a year ago and no one’s been pushing it until February this year.

    in reply to: #2083
    Kyle
    Member

    Times:
    Saturday 10 am – 4:30 pm
    Sunday 9 am – 12 noon

    Cost: $50 (includes a copy of the rulebook I believe).

    in reply to: #1967
    Kyle
    Member

    As in ‘technically I advise’, but Ryan left me behind in web site design some time ago, as I haven’t done it for years, and he’s entered serious geek mode with it.

    Now I just whine at him about it and keep him on track <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smiley.gif" alt=":)” title=”Smiley” />

    in reply to: #2483
    Kyle
    Member

    There are also… y’know, laws to consider. Don’t you need a registered electrician to install lights, and guarantee that we won’t burn the stadium down? The city council might also need to approve the work, which, even if Graham was to help with the plans, would still cost… a few hundred dollars I’m guessing. And they might need to inspect it afterwards.

    I’m no expert on these things, especially given that it’s a commercial and not a residential building.

    I presume on your drawing where you have what looks like 4.99 cm, you mean 4.99 metres?

    If it’s a shooting gallery, then no net is going to be an adequate replacement for a wall. Nets degrade, do so less obviously (ie, small holes that people might hit occasionally), and if there’s a few hundred slap shots going into it every day, then no net is going to last that long.

    You should talk to Paul. I’d imagine he wouldn’t find it difficult to get a thousand dollars from somewhere to do the off ice area. Why do it on the cheap when fundraising and doing it properly won’t cost us any more?

    in reply to: #2180
    Kyle
    Member

    Nah. Lawyers charge in 6 minute lots. So $30/6 minutes.

    in reply to: #2178
    Kyle
    Member

    You’re doing ‘lawyers on ice’ this Xmas?

    in reply to: #1963
    Kyle
    Member

    I can take pretty much zero credit for the web site. That’s Ryan’s gig.

    I do… other stuff <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smiley.gif" alt=":)” title=”Smiley” />

    in reply to: #2472
    Kyle
    Member

    Or, to switch my brain on before I answer. Andre must know. He is a professional painter after all.

    in reply to: #2471
    Kyle
    Member

    I have no idea, but I would have thought Resenes would be a good place to start. If they don’t have it, they’d probably have someone who knew where it could be sourced.

    in reply to: #2469
    Kyle
    Member

    I’m still voting on the epoxy paint.

    Because by my count you’ve been around and rejected every other option <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/wink.gif" alt=";)” title=”Wink” />

    in reply to: #1457
    Kyle
    Member

    Just times, and I don’t know if they’re changing. But Phil took away the time that I negotiated with the club a couple of weeks ago, and put it as power skating in his draft timetable, and so now I have to wait until after next week’s meeting to confirm a time. Or something.

    in reply to: #2176
    Kyle
    Member

    Yeah, give me a day or two. I had a spanner thrown in the works last night and I need to make sure these are correct. <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/smiley.gif" alt=":)” title=”Smiley” />

    in reply to: #1454
    Kyle
    Member

    Hey Ryan,

    Can you take the DIHL stuff down off the web site please.

    Man I love doing things… twice.

Viewing 15 posts - 1,006 through 1,020 (of 1,238 total)